Go Back   SZONE.US Forums > Current Events > News > The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation Since its founding in 1973, The Heritage Foundation has served as a research and educational institute -- a think tank -- whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense

The Heritage Foundation

It?s a Myth That High Tax Rates Would Actually Lead to Rich People Paying More

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
Unread 03.14.19, 12:49 AM
@Heritage @Heritage is offline
Join Date: 06.09
Posts: 32,056
It?s a Myth That High Tax Rates Would Actually Lead to Rich People Paying More

On 03.13.19 12:44 PM posted by John Stossel

Do you pay enough taxes? What is enough?

When asked on “60 Minutes,” Rep. AlexandriaOcasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., didn’t seem to have a specific tax rate in mind, butthen she said, “back in the ’60s … you see tax rates as high as 60 or 70percent.”

Suddenly, 70 percent tax rates are a progressive plan,although Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., added, “We’ve had it as high as 90percent.”

She’s right.

That was the top tax rate when I was a kid, and today, manyDemocrats say if we’d just raise rates on rich people, government would haveplenty of money to pay for our wonderful programs.

But it’s a myth.

What progressives don’t say, perhaps because they don’t know it, is what economic historian Dr. Phillip Magness explains in my new video: “No one actually paid anywhere close to those rates.”

For more than a decade, Magness has researched old taxes.

He discovered that America’s 90 percent tax bracket didn’tbring in much extra money. That’s because rich people found loopholes.

Then, because of that, and because the high tax rates discouraged work, President John Kennedy backed a bill that lowered the top rate to 70 percent.

But it turned out that the 70 percent rate wasn’t very realeither.

“A millionaire on average would pay 41 percent,”says Magness, because of “all these deductions and exemptions andcarve-outs that are intentionally baked into the tax code.”

If you look at newspapers of that time, you see adspromoting things like free $2,499 ocean cruises.

“[B]asically take a vacation around the Caribbean,” explains Magness, “but while you’re onboard the ship you attend, say, an investing seminar or a real estate seminar, and then write off the trip.”

Some rich people bought musical instruments for their kidsand deducted the cost because, say, a clarinet would supposedly provide“therapeutic treatment.”

Instead of investing in ideas that might create real wealth,rich people hired accountants to study the tax code.

“Who can afford the best accountants? It’s always thewealthy,” says Magness.

Today, our top tax rate is 37 percent. A dozen years after Kennedy’s tax cuts, Ronald Reagan proposed reducing the 70 percent rate, saying, “Our tax system could only be described as un-American.”

“Democrats actually agree with him,” recountsMagness. “Reagan goes to the table and says, ‘Let’s make a deal … cutthe rates … and in exchange, we’ll consolidate the tax code.”

They did.

Surprise—the lower rates brought in just as much money.

It turns out that tax revenue as a percentage of grossdomestic product stays about the same no matter what the top bracket is. Highertax rates don’t necessarily get rich people to pay more taxes.

“They’ll change where they earn their income,” economist Art Laffer told me about what he’d once said to Reagan. “They’ll change how they earn their income. They’ll change how much they earn, when they receive the income. They’ll change all of those things to minimize taxes.”

President Donald Trump, who in some years paid zero income tax, understands that. Before he became president, I asked him about a proposed tax hike.

“Look, the rich people are going to leave—and other people are going to leave!” he told me. “You are going to end up with lots of people that don’t produce. And then, that’s the spiral. That’s the end.”

That happened in Europe, recounts Magness: “Franceattempted a massive tax on its wealthiest earners. … the business people leftin a mass exodus from the country.”

But today’s progressives are selective when they look at history. On TV, Ocasio-Cortez said, “Under Republican administration … Dwight Eisenhower, we had 90 percent marginal tax rate.”

I asked Magness what would happen if the U.S. were to return to those rates—while also eliminating the deductions that came with them.

“You’re asking for an economic disaster,” he answered. “I ask the question: Do we leave [wealth] in the private sector where the market decides? Or do we subject it to corrupt politicians?”

Please, let’s leave most of America’s wealth in privatehands.


The post It’s a Myth That High Tax Rates Would Actually Lead to Rich People Paying More appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007 - 20017 SZONE.US All rights reserved