Go Back   SZONE.US Forums > Current Events > News > The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation Since its founding in 1973, The Heritage Foundation has served as a research and educational institute -- a think tank -- whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense

The Heritage Foundation

3 Steps to Take the Surprise Out of Surprise Medical Bills

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
Unread 12.04.19, 02:59 AM
@Heritage @Heritage is offline
Join Date: 06.09
Posts: 34,340
3 Steps to Take the Surprise Out of Surprise Medical Bills

On 12.03.19 06:22 PM posted by Doug Badger

Surprise medical bills are a source of frustration for many Americans. Patients who schedule medical care from network physicians or at network hospitals sometimes receive bills from doctors outside the network such as anesthesiologists, radiologists, or pathologists.

Or a patient may be transported to a nearby emergency department, only to learn that the hospital was not in her insurance companyís network.

In cases like these, patients are saddled with bills that can be very high, potentially running into tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars.

In a new paper, coauthor Brian Blase and I propose a market-based solution to such surprise medical bills. This proposal, if implemented, will equip consumers with the information they need to so they can make more informed health care decisions.

Our proposal requires insurers and providers to supply accurate and timely information about networks and prices. It segments the surprise billing problem into four distinct categories, depending on the network status of the facility and whether the medical services are emergency or nonemergency.

In Network Out of Network Non-emergency care Disclosure (up front price information) and penalties on false and misleading information about network status. For scheduled care, facilities and providers would be required to provide a good faith estimate. Penalties would be established on insurers who represent facilities, and on facilities that represent themselves, as being in-network when they permit balance billing for services delivered at that facility.

Disclosure (up front price information). For scheduled care, facilities and providers would be required to provide a good faith estimate. Facilities and providers cannot balance bill patients after delivering nonemergency services unless they provided them with good faith estimates of balance billed amounts before providing the services. Emergency care Penalties on false and misleading information about network status. Penalties would be established on insurers who represent facilities, and on facilities who represent themselves, as being in-network when they permit balance billing for services delivered at that facility. Prohibit balance billing and require reasonable reimbursement. Facilities and providers could not balance bill for any emergency services, as defined in EMTALA. Insurers would be required to provide facilities and providers with reasonable reimbursement for such services, as defined in existing regulations (45 CFR 147.138(b)(3)(i)).

Note: Balance billed amounts refer to what the provider bills the patient, minus what the insurer pays.

Here are the three major elements of our recommendations:

1. Price disclosure. Unlike virtually every other service in the economy, consumers donít know the prices of scheduled, nonemergency care until long after receiving it. The government does not need to mandate price disclosure in other areas of the economy that function efficiently. But efficiency is not a key feature of health care markets, which are beset by excessive third-party payment and price opacity.

Congress should correct this problem by requiring providers to supply a good faith estimate of the cost of scheduled medical care before it occurs, unless the patient affirmatively declines an estimate. Providers that refuse to supply an estimate before providing care could not ďbalance billĒ (i.e., charge a patient an amount above what the insurer pays the provider) afterward.

2. Penalties on insurers and providers for supplying false and misleading information about a facilityís network status. Consumers typically seek network physicians and hospitals to avoid high out-of-network bills. They rely on representations about network status from their insurance company and from the hospital itself.

What their insurer and hospital often donít tell patients is that other doctors who might participate in their care are notpart of their insurerís network. Patients learn that only weeks or months later, when the bill from the non-network physician arrives.

Congress should protect consumers against false and misleading information. It should establish penalties for insurers that represent a facility as being in-network, and a facility that presents itself as being in-network, if doctors balance-bill for services they provide at that facility.

To be considered a network facility, the insurer, the facility, and the doctors who practice there would have to negotiate arrangements that protect patients against surprise bills. Hospitals that permit surprise bills could not be represented as network hospitals without penalty.

3. Ban balance billing at non-network emergency departments. Accurate information about a hospitalís network status and price transparency donít help the patient who is suffering severe chest pains or being transported in an ambulance. Such patients generally will go or be taken to the nearest emergency room. Broad consensus exists in Congress and among the public that patients in those circumstances should not face large bills for out-of-network care.

Consistent with that consensus, we propose that Congress ban surprise billing in these limited circumstances and require insurers to pay, and providers to accept, reimbursement rates spelled out in existing federal regulations.

Those regulations, which already govern insurance company payments to non-network providers of emergency care, require insurers to pay providers the greatest of: a) the Medicare rate; b) the median network rate; or c) the amount an insurer generally pays non-network providers.

The alternativesósuch as doing nothing and arbitrationóare worse, and accurate information about network status and prices are of no value in this unique circumstance.

These recommendations should, to the extent possible, be implemented in a way that preserves the ability of states to adopt policies that best serve their residents.

This proposal offers a better path for Congress, which currently seems headed in a very different and counterproductive direction. Although they differ in some respects, the House and Senate proposals rely on sweeping and unnecessary federal price regulation, rather than market-based alternatives, to eliminate balance billing. Both would force doctors and insurers who have not contracted with each other to accept rates set in contracts they havenít signed.

The principal appeal of rate-setting is that the Congressional Budget Office believes it will produce budgetary savings–savings that Congress plans to spend to fund government programs. While budget savings are great, they should not drive Congress to impose rates outside government programs.

Our proposal guarantees no more surprises without resorting to heavy-handed measures. If consumers go to an in-network facility, they canít be balance-billed. And they will receive good faith estimates for scheduled care.

Congress should solve the balance-billing problem by giving patients more control over their medical care with accurate information about medical prices.

The post 3 Steps to Take the Surprise Out of Surprise Medical Bills appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007 - 20017 SZONE.US All rights reserved