Go Back   SZONE.US Forums > Current Events > News > The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation Since its founding in 1973, The Heritage Foundation has served as a research and educational institute -- a think tank -- whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense

The Heritage Foundation

How Louisiana Undermined Its Own School Choice Program

Views:283
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
  #1  
Unread 05.16.19, 11:30 AM
@Heritage @Heritage is offline
RSS Bot
 
Join Date: 06.09
Posts: 32,624
How Louisiana Undermined Its Own School Choice Program

On 05.16.19 09:30 AM posted by Jude Schwalbach

“You couldn’t learn. There was so much bullying. Kids are bullying the other kids and they’re bullying you,” said Willie Augustus, who was relentlessly bullied in his public school in Louisiana.

His parentsunsuccessfully fought with the school board to address the school bullying.Eventually, they applied for and received a voucher for Willie to attend aprivate school of their choice in Baton Rouge through the Louisiana ScholarshipProgram.

Willie’s story is not unique. Thankfully, schoolchoice enables hundreds of thousands of children throughout the country to findsafe and effective learning environments that are the right fit for them. And manyparents are pursuing this out of a concern for school safety.

Louisiana ranked dead last in overall performance and 49th in education, according to U.S. News & World Report’s “Best States 2018.” So it’s no surprise that many low-income families jumped at the opportunity to participate in the Louisiana Scholarship Program.

The program provides low-income families with a scholarshipaveraging $6,000to pay for tuition at private schools that are compliant with stateregulations. Many parents see this as a way for their kids to attend a schoolthat’s a better fit, offers superior education, and provides a safer environment.

That’s what happened for Willie. Everything changed when he receiveda state scholarship to Angels Academy. “Once we found that right school, Willieblossomed into a whole other person,” said Willie’s mom.

Willie’s story of improved safety is a common theme with Louisiana’s scholarship program. Yet on testing measures, the program has produced lackluster results. This has come as a surprise to some observers, since similar private school choice programs across the country have strong records of improving both school safety and academic outcomes (see Wisconsin, for example).

Louisiana Scholarship Program evaluations found that voucher participants on average scored lower than their peers in public schools on the state test, especially in math.

Those who oppose the program blamed its shortcomings on parents for being unable to make good education choices for their children.

As Jarvis DeBerry, a columnist at The Times-Picayune, commented, “Lawmakers insisted those schools give voucher recipients the same tests public-school students take. Because they did, it’s been clear for years that parents aren’t the best judges of a school’s educational quality.”

Not only is such an assessment condescending to parents,it’s incorrect.

New research suggests that the state’s heaviest-in-the-nationregulatory regime, lauded as a measure of academic accountability, could be atthe root of the program’s problems.

The Louisiana Scholarship Program is ahighly regulated school choice program. To enroll scholarship recipients, participatingprivate schools must participate in state testing, aligned with the public schoolcurriculum.

Moreover, private schools cannot use a selective admissionsprocess to determine if the school is a good fit for the voucher recipient.

Patrick J. Wolf, a professor at the University of Arkansas,argues that Louisiana’s regulations homogenize private and public schools.

Wolf contends that since schools have to participate in state testing to qualify for the Louisiana Scholarship Program, the schools are incentivized to align their curricula with state norms and the public school system, which is not necessarily high-quality.

This type of regulation essentially forces private schoolsto teach for the state test.

To make matters worse, the state test changed twice during Wolf’s evaluation. That means students took three different tests in four years—hardly an equitable measure of quality.

Many Louisiana private schools knew that participating inthe program could have meant sacrificing their distinctive school cultures andcurricula—making them no different than their public school counterparts—andnegating the “choice” in school choice. Consequently, onlyone-third of Louisiana’s private schools chose to participate in the program.

Although there is no universal measure of private school quality, Wolf noted that schools most likely to participate in the scholarship program were “low-quality schools” that already struggled with enrollment, as evidenced by student attrition prior to entering the program.

Wolf’s analysis is supported by his recent study with the Reason Foundation’s Corey DeAngelis and The Heritage Foundation’s Lindsey Burke on how regulations affect private schools in New York and California. They discovered that two regulations severely impacted private schools’ participation in the voucher program:
  • If participation required schools to have openadmissions policies, private school participation dropped by 60%.
  • Similarly, if the state required private schoolsto administer the state test, participation dropped by nearly 30%.
These are the same type of regulations that Louisianalawmakers use to measure the Louisiana Scholarship Program.

The fact is that private schools oppose regulations thatdestroy their distinctive culture, environment, and learning approaches.

Louisiana’s burdensome regulations may have doomedexcellence in the state scholarship program from the start by dissuading thebest private schools from participating. And paradoxically, the regulations—designedostensibly to create “accountability” for schools participating in the voucherprogram—encouraged lower quality private schools to participate, and limitedfamilies’ access to the best schools in the state.

States that are serious about providing real choice in educationshould remember that a flourishing market of options driven by parents willprovide more accountability and quality than heavy-handed regulations everwill.

As an increasing number of states work to free educationfrom the monopoly system that has hindered educational excellence for a century,Louisiana’s experience should remain front and center.

The post How Louisiana Undermined Its Own School Choice Program appeared first on The Daily Signal.



https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/05/...hoice-program/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007 - 20017 SZONE.US All rights reserved