Go Back   SZONE.US Forums > Current Events > News > The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation Since its founding in 1973, The Heritage Foundation has served as a research and educational institute -- a think tank -- whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense

The Heritage Foundation

Common Sense in Free Fall on College Campuses

Views:223
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
  #1  
Unread 08.09.19, 01:39 PM
@Heritage @Heritage is offline
RSS Bot
 
Join Date: 06.09
Posts: 33,425
Common Sense in Free Fall on College Campuses

On 08.09.19 11:25 AM posted by Jason Snead

Evidence is mounting that politicalideology is corrupting the liberal arts.

According to CampusReform, in late July, Portland State University accused one of its professors, PeterBoghossian, of “‘questionable ethical behavior’ and banned him from conductingacademic research.”

What was the professor’s offense? He successfully convinced several prestigious, peer-reviewed journals to publish articles that were anything but scholarly. In one, he analyzed “dog rape culture,” in another, he republished portions of Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf,” spruced up with academic buzzwords.

This may sound like anoff-color prank, but it was a serious effort to expose a grave problem oncollege campuses. Boghossian’s hypothesis was simple: the leftist fixation on intersectionalityand what he termed “grievance studies” have led to a sharp decline in thequality and rigor of scholarship within the discipline.

Boghossian and his two colleagues, Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay, made headlines in 2018 for completing an investigation into how lax some humanities journals had become.

The trio wrote and submitted 20 “hoax” articles to several prominent academic journals in various academic fields, including gender and queer studies, that the researchers felt were most influenced by progressive ideology rather than objective research.

When seven of their “fake” studies were published after undergoing the purportedly-scrupulous “peer review” process, Boghossian and his team released a report demonstrating how ideologically-driven academia has become.

It brings to mind the “Sokal hoax” of the mid-90s, when a New York University physicist submitted a similarly “fake” study that also ended up being published.

PSU’s Internal ReviewBoard then sanctioned Boghossian for “fabricating data and studying humansubjects, specifically the various journal editors, without their consent.”

The Internal ReviewBoard seems to have missed the purpose of the professor’s study.

The censure leddirectly to the ban Boghossian now faces. The academy seems more interested inmaking an example of him than acknowledging the concern about a lack of qualitycontrol in the field of “grievance studies,” which his efforts unveiled.

It is not as ifcitizens are unaware of the issues plaguing higher education.

From the oft-referencedreplication crisis in the social sciences (whereinacademic studies cannot be reproduced by unaffiliated researchers), the insane cost of college, and the liberal bentof a staggering percentage of university professors, many studentswould do well to reconsider the value of attending college over trade schoolsor other similar, skill-developing opportunities.

Boghossian’s study revealed the dangerous road that academia is sprinting down. He cited “constructivism”—the idea that truth is temporally and culturally situated—as the main culprit infecting academic research, especially within the humanities.

The research team notedthat “radical constructivists tend to believe science and reason must bedismantled to let ‘other ways of knowing’ have equal validation asknowledge-producing enterprises.” This idea could be what is driving manyacademic journals down the ideological rabbit hole.

As Boghossian and histeam stated in their study, “As we progressed, we started to realize that justabout anything can be made to work,so long as it falls within the moral orthodoxy and demonstrates understandingof existing literature.”

Scholarsacross the world agreed with the authors’ motives and conclusions, and wrote toPSU’s vice president for research administration in support of Boghossian. EvenAlan Sokal, the NYU scientist who got into hot water for his similar effort in 1996, defended the beleagueredPortland professor, writing:
It seems to me that it would be a grave injustice to punish Professor Boghossian for a violation of the letter of the [Research Misconduct Policy] that did not constitute in any way a violation of that policy’s purpose and which moreover was undertaken with the goal of serving, and which did, in fact, serve the public interest …

Unfortunately, but unsurprisingly, given the university administration’s reaction, many of Boghossian’s fellow professors at PSU were not as supportive. In an anonymous letter to the editor in the university’s newspaper, the anti-Boghossian group wrote:
[T]he ‘hoaxes’ are simply lies peddled to journals, masquerading as articles. … Chronic and pathological, unscholarly behavior inside an institution of higher education brings negative publicity to the institution as well as the honest scholars who work there. Worse yet, it jeopardizes the students’ reputations, as their degrees in the process may become devalued.

Boghossian’s aggrieved colleaguesseem to have missed the entire point of his study, and may prefer for theirstudents to learn from such indoctrination.

Christina Hoff Sommers, noted scholar and critic of modern feminism, described Boghossian’s hoax project as an “eye-opening experiment,” the results of which “raise serious questions about the methods of several seemingly legitimate academic journals.”

She went on, accordingto Campus Reform, to “address the accusation of improperly studying humansubjects, saying ‘This charge is hard to take seriously. By its very nature,the parody rules out the possibility of consent: It is the view of the [InternalReview Board] that academic journals should be shielded from critical orirreverent scrutiny?”

PSU stated in itsdisciplinary letter that it is willing to giveBoghossian another chance to conduct research, if he completes a required “protectionof human subjects training” course and otherwise satisfies the university’s administration.

However, for a nontenured professor who himself acknowledges he does not “fit the mold” of the “ideological community” on campus, the odds of him being permitted to resume his research may be slim.

Boghossian’s experimenthighlights the problems of groupthink in any environment, especially academia.

If humanitiesprofessors are going to be more interested in placating popular opinion ratherthan exposing shoddy academic practices bordering on charlatanry, then we should stop describing ourhumanities’ departments as bastions of truth.

Truth is objective, notsubject to the prevailing winds of academia and the left at large.

Stifling academicdebate, exercising a heckler’s veto over messages that do not fit within anideology prescribed by liberal academics, and promoting shoddy “research” thatsupports that ideology, will not advance the search for truth, which should bethe ultimate goal of any serious academic institution.

All it will do isperpetuate irrationality and ignorance.

The post Common Sense in Free Fall on College Campuses appeared first on The Daily Signal.



https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/08/...llege-campuses
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007 - 20017 SZONE.US All rights reserved