Go Back   SZONE.US Forums > Current Events > News > The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation Since its founding in 1973, The Heritage Foundation has served as a research and educational institute -- a think tank -- whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense

The Heritage Foundation

7 Justices Split 5 Ways in Deciding Peace Cross Doesn’t Have to Go

Views:246
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
  #1  
Unread 06.20.19, 02:28 PM
@Heritage @Heritage is offline
RSS Bot
 
Join Date: 06.09
Posts: 35,293
7 Justices Split 5 Ways in Deciding Peace Cross Doesn’t Have to Go

On 06.20.19 12:36 PM posted by Thomas Jipping

The Supreme Court decided 7-2Thursday that a 40-foot cross erected on government land in Bladensburg,Maryland, as a memorial to those from that community who died in World War I isnot an unconstitutional “establishment of religion.”

The influence of this decision on future Establishment Clausecases is unclear, however, because the seven justices in the majority splitfive different ways in explaining their conclusion.

America’s Founders knew, as Congress would say unanimously in 1998, the “right to freedom of religion undergirds the very origin and existence of the United States.”

This led them to include two religion clauses in the First Amendment to the Constitution, one protecting the “free exercise of religion” and the other prohibiting government’s “establishment of religion.”

When someone sues the government, claiming that it has violated the Establishment Clause, a court must do two things: interpret the clause, or figure out what it means, and apply it to the facts of the case.

Judges have two basic options for interpreting constitutional provisions such as the Establishment Clause. They either can look for what it meant from the beginning or for what they want it to mean now.

Unfortunately, since the 1930s, judges often have preferred their personal version of the Constitution over the one America’s Founders gave us.

This often leads to confusing and contradictory decisions.

One of those was the Supreme Court’s 1971 decision in Lemon v. Kurtzman, which laid out three criteria for determining when the government had established religion.

The problem is that in Lemon, and decisions like it, the court is simply making up its own meaning for the Constitution. When one three-part test or newfangled formula fails to work well, the court simply invents another one.

Which brings us to American Legion v. American Humanist Association,
the Bladensburg Peace Cross case.

The American Humanist Association sued, claiming that maintaining the war memorial established religion because the cross is a clearly religious symbol. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed.

The Supreme Court reversed the appeals court by a strong 7-2 vote announced Thursday. So the cross-shaped memorial to 49 fallen soldiers will stay right where it is.

The Supreme Court’s judgment decides any given individualcase, but its opinion explaining the judgment influences other cases. In thiscase, however, seven justices agreed on the judgment but there was no clearmajority opinion explaining it.

Four justices criticized Lemon’s “shortcomings,” but wanted to find a way to avoid that precedent rather than overturn it.

Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer and Brett Kavanaugh, suggested creating a presumption that Lemon does not apply to cases challenging “longstanding monuments, symbols, and practices.”

Breyer, joined by Justice Elena Kagan, wrote a separateopinion in which he stated that “there is no single formula for resolvingEstablishment Clause challenges.”

Kavanaugh, also writing a separate concurrence, observedthat “this Court no longer applies the old test articulated in” Lemon and offeredhis own four-part replacement.

Kagan, in another concurring opinion, thought that one of Lemon’sthree criteria was problematic, but the other two were “crucial in evaluatinggovernment action in this sphere.”

Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch agreed with theresult, but not any of those rationales.

Gorsuch argued that being an “offended observer” should notbe enough to challenge something like a memorial or a display as anestablishment of religion. In a large and diverse country, he wrote, “offensecan be easily found” but “recourse for disagreement and offense does lie infederal litigation.”

Regarding Lemon, Gorsuch characterized the much-criticized opinion as a “misadventure” and added that “not a single Member of the Court even tries to defend Lemon against these criticisms—and they don’t because they can’t.”

Thomas went a step further than Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. “I would take the next logical step and overrule the Lemon test in all contexts,” Thomas wrote, because it “has no basis in the original meaning of the Constitution.”

Instead, Thomas said, judges use it to “fit whatever result they want to reach.”

The “obvious explanation is that Lemon does not provide a sound basis for judging Establishment Clause claims,” he wrote. “It is our job to say what the law is, and because Lemon is not good law, we ought to say so.”

Many hoped that this decision, in one fell swoop, would get rid of the baggage from precedents such as Lemon. But the Supreme Court has been reinterpreting and twisting the Establishment Clause for more than 70 years, and there is a great deal to set right.

The high court did not go that far, at least not this time.But as Gorsuch put it, this is a “welcome step” in the right direction.

The post 7 Justices Split 5 Ways in Deciding Peace Cross Doesn’t Have to Go appeared first on The Daily Signal.



https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/06/...snt-have-to-go
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007 - 20017 SZONE.US All rights reserved