Go Back   SZONE.US Forums > Current Events > News > The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation Since its founding in 1973, The Heritage Foundation has served as a research and educational institute -- a think tank -- whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense

The Heritage Foundation

Unhappy With Quick Vote on Spending Bill, Lawmaker Proposes Legislation to Give Lawma

Views:96
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
  #1  
Unread 04.12.18, 01:59 PM
@Heritage @Heritage is offline
RSS Bot
 
Join Date: 06.09
Posts: 37,063
Unhappy With Quick Vote on Spending Bill, Lawmaker Proposes Legislation to Give Lawma

On 04.12.18 12:49 PM posted by Rachel del Guidice

One conservative lawmaker, upset by the $1.3 trillion spending bill last month, wants to pass legislation that would give lawmakers more time to read bills before they vote on them.

“This isn’t a very big ask,” Rep. Tom Garrett, R-Va., told The Daily Signal in a phone interview.

Garrett’s bill would amend House rules, requiring “any bill to be publicly available for a number of minutes that’s double the number of pages,” the website for Virginia radio station WVTF*reported.

The spending bill, which was signed by President Donald Trump, was 2,232 pages long. The House Freedom Caucus, a group of conservative lawmakers, said the bill was released fewer than*36 hours before lawmakers voted on it.

“We’re asking for two minutes per page,” says Garrett. “My understanding is it takes the average human about two minutes to read a single-spaced page, so what this [bill] would have done is give us 74.4 hours on the 2,232-page bill.”

“Theoretically, there is a 72-hour rule, but it gets waived, and … we’re trying to create a circumstance where in order to waive [time] to read it, you’d need a full vote of the House, so that one committee isn’t vested with all the power to waive the right of review—the duty of review, really—of all the members,” the Virginia lawmaker said.

If his bill were to pass, some lawmakers may still choose not to read legislation Congress is voting on, Garrett acknowledges.

“It may be the case that some people won’t review it, and candidly, if had 74.4 hours, what I would have done is gotten my entire legislative staff together and me … and we would have broken it up and tried to read it in entirety and discuss it as a group,” Garrett said, adding: “Even if you had 74.4 hours, that would mean that you read nonstop without sleeping or eating.”

The bill, Garrett says, is not a political stunt, but a way to help Congress be more productive and accountable.

“I would like to see this voted on, I would like to see it passed,” he said, predicting it could garner “bipartisan support.”

The post Unhappy With Quick Vote on Spending Bill, Lawmaker Proposes Legislation to Give Lawmakers More Time to Read Bills appeared first on The Daily Signal.



https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/04/...to-read-bills/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007 - 20017 SZONE.US All rights reserved