Go Back   SZONE.US Forums > Current Events > News > The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation Since its founding in 1973, The Heritage Foundation has served as a research and educational institute -- a think tank -- whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense

The Heritage Foundation

CTBT: State Departmentís Misleading Fact Sheets

Views:191
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
  #1  
Unread 10.05.11, 10:17 AM
@Heritage @Heritage is offline
RSS Bot
 
Join Date: 06.09
Posts: 37,445
CTBT: State Departmentís Misleading Fact Sheets

On 10.05.11 07:45 AM posted by Baker Spring


On September 29, the State Department released a fact sheet that unequivocally asserts that the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) is a ďzero-yieldĒ treaty. Under this assertion, the CTBT, once it enters into force, would bar all experiments on nuclear weapons that produce a self-sustaining fission chain reaction.

At the same time, the State Department released an accompanying fact sheet that provides past quotes from diplomats and political leaders from all five of the de jure nuclear weapons states (the U.S., China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom) that it sees as bolstering its interpretation of what is prohibited by the CTBT.

The fact is that CTBT does not provide a definition of what by its title it would purport to ban. While the fact sheets acknowledge this fact, they depart from the facts by offering an assertion by the State Department itself and by others regarding the central requirement of the CTBT that the CTBT is a zero-yield treaty.*At that point, the fact sheets are no longer about facts. Other authorities disagree with the State Departmentís assertion. For example, some members of the congressionally appointed Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States, which issued its report in 2009, found that countries that interpret the CTBT differently than the U.S. may conduct tests with hundreds of tons of nuclear yield.

What is a fact is that the same commission, despite being divided on the issue of whether the U.S. should ratify the CTBT, unanimously recommended that the five nuclear weapons states adopt an agreement providing a ďclear and precise definition of banned and permitted test activityĒ under the CTBT prior to Senate reconsideration of the question of ratification.

The commission made this recommendation in the context of the fact that the Senate voted to reject ratification in 1999, which the State Department chose not to acknowledge in its fact sheets.

It is also a fact that the State Departmentís assertion about the meaning of the central provision of the CTBT is not the same as an agreement among the five nuclear weapons states regarding this provision. Do the State Departmentís fact sheets represent an attempt on the Administrationís part to evade a clear recommendation of the commission? This is a question that Senators should demand that the State Department answer.



http://blog.heritage.org/2011/10/05/...g-fact-sheets/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007 - 20017 SZONE.US All rights reserved