Go Back   SZONE.US Forums > Current Events > News > The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation Since its founding in 1973, The Heritage Foundation has served as a research and educational institute -- a think tank -- whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense

The Heritage Foundation

Panetta Credits Trent Lott With Reviving Push for LOST Ratification

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
Unread 05.10.12, 12:08 PM
@Heritage @Heritage is offline
Join Date: 06.09
Posts: 37,398
Panetta Credits Trent Lott With Reviving Push for LOST Ratification

On 05.10.12 09:55 AM posted by Lachlan Markay

Scribe first reported that former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MI) is now lobbying for corporate and environmental interests on behalf of the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, also known as the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST).

His lobbying efforts stand in stark contrast to his position while in the Senate, when he warned that LOST would create a “U.N. on steroids.” Ratification of LOST, he warned in 2007, would “cede our national sovereignty – both militarily and economically” by subjecting maritime disputes to U.N. authority.

While LOST’s prospects seemed dim, lately “hopes*for ratification have been revived,” according to Congressional Quarterly. Chief among the forces advancing ratification has been Lott’s lobbying work.

“One reason for the treaty advocates’ new optimism is the support from former Mississippi Republican Sen. Trent Lott,” writes CQ. “Seeing Trent Lott in the room, I feel a hell of a lot better about the chances for ratification,” said Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who has been pushing hard for ratification.

Lobbying disclosure forms show that Lott is working on behalf of Shell Oil and Pike Associates, another lobbying firm with ties to the*environmentalist*movement.

Shell insists that LOST would grant the U.S. sovereignty over its continental waters. But as the Washington Examiner’s Tim Carney pointed out, “multinational companies prefer global regulation to national regulation.”

“Such uniformity wipes out any home-field advantage local companies might have over the big guys,” Carney explained, “and so even if the total regulatory burden is heavier, it’s still easier to navigate.”

As for the*environmental*interests lobbying for the treaty, LOST would give the United Nations the authority to impose environmental sanctions on the United States, as Heritage’s Kim Holmes explained.

“Opportunistic nations would lodge any number of specious allegations, charging anything from environmental degradation to poisoning the ocean with carbon emissions,” noted Holmes. “The U.S. would be treaty-bound to adhere to whatever decisions are handed down.”

Lott himself offered notable and legitimate objections to the treaty’s ratification. But his subsequent work in favor of LOST may be enough to revive the measure in the Senate. If LOST becomes law, Lott will have played no small part in the effort.

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007 - 20017 SZONE.US All rights reserved