Go Back   SZONE.US Forums > Current Events > News > The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation Since its founding in 1973, The Heritage Foundation has served as a research and educational institute -- a think tank -- whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense

The Heritage Foundation

New Regulations Equal New Crimes: Congressís Overreliance on Criminal Statutes as Reg

Views:70
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
  #1  
Unread 07.25.12, 05:02 PM
@Heritage @Heritage is offline
RSS Bot
 
Join Date: 06.09
Posts: 37,392
New Regulations Equal New Crimes: Congressís Overreliance on Criminal Statutes as Reg

On 07.25.12 01:30 PM posted by Gavriel Swerling


There is currently a bill before the Senate to establish a Concrete Masonry Products Board, the purpose of which is to ďcarry out a coordinated program of research, education, and promotion to improve, maintain, and develop markets for concrete masonry products.Ē

The fact that the government feels the need to regulate this industry at the expense of the taxpayers is, in itself, troubling. What is even more worrisome is that the government feels the need to regulate the concrete industry through criminal enforcement.

This new bill would make it a federal offense, punishable by a $5,000 fine and up to one year in prison, for members or agents of this proposed board to share information that they receive with non-board members. This is just another misuse of the criminal law as a regulatory tool.

The government routinely relies on criminal statutes as regulatory tools, resulting in a labyrinth of more than 4,000 federal criminal laws. Here is another one to add to the pile. It seems that every time Congress faces a problem, its immediate reaction is to create a new crime.

This time the crime is sharing information about concrete. Letís add that to the list of other heinous federal crimes, including shipping lobsters in plastic instead of cardboard boxes and mistakenly using the wrong type of label to ship chemicals used for scientific research.

That conduct may be wrongdoing (and worse, in some cases it really isnít or shouldnít be considered such), but it does not warrant the creation of new criminal statutes that include jail time. They are problems that can and should be resolved with civil penalties, not a career-ruining criminal record.

The one yearís imprisonment would make the crime just a misdemeanor. Why just a misdemeanor? Maybe it is because no one will think that Congress is serious if the only penalty is a fine. Maybe Congress wants a federal law enforcement agency (presumably the FBI) to be able to investigate violations of this law. Maybe itís just force of habit.

Whatever the reason, if a punishment is necessary at allóthe better solution is to not have superfluous boards regulating private industriesóthen a civil fine should be more than sufficient. Impose treble damages if you like. That should provide ample deterrent. And if Congress wants the FBI to be able to investigate violations of this law, then amend the statutes granting the FBI investigatory authority so that they can question everyone involved. That should be sufficient.

We donít need to resort to grand jury subpoenas and search warrants (wiretaps will be next), to say nothing of jail time, to deal with these miscreants.

Gavriel Swerling is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm.



http://blog.heritage.org/2012/07/25/...ulatory-tools/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007 - 20017 SZONE.US All rights reserved